$195 000 median player salary- will reduce player exodus in South Africa.
- Simon A
- Jun 29, 2024
- 5 min read
Currently, there is a growing consensus that South Africa won the Rugby World Cup in 2019 and 2023 due to a change in policy allowing players to be available for selection even if they played abroad. According to this theory, this was a key move by Rassie Erasmus, often cited as a masterstroke and the most significant factor in South Africa's recent World Cup successes. However, as the data shows, players were already playing abroad in 2011 and 2015 without achieving World Cup success, while the 2007 victory was achieved with all players based in South Africa. This suggests that player exodus is not the sole factor behind Springbok success.
South Africa Player Exodus or other factors
It is doubtful that the exodus of players was a strategic move by South Africa rugby to get players up to standard (although it did help players understand all the top leagues) due to inferior South African coaching. Instead, it was the financial attraction that lured them abroad. The key factor was not the promise of massive salaries (with some outliers) but rather the reduction in rugby salaries in South Africa, primarily due to the devaluation of the rand and a struggling economy. The graphs below illustrate how South African median salaries decreased compared to other major rugby-playing countries, with a tipping point occurring after 2010, potentially aligning with key economic data from South Africa.
Foreign Player Ratio
The ratio of foreign-based players in national rugby teams varies significantly by country. South Africa operates an open policy allowing players to freely play abroad and still be eligible for the national team. In contrast, countries like New Zealand and Ireland enforce a closed policy, requiring players to remain in domestic leagues to qualify for national selection. Other nations adopt a limited approach, such as Australia's "Giteau Law" and Wales' "60 Cap Rule," which permit the selection of experienced players playing abroad. This flexibility in policy impacts the availability and quality of players for national squads, influencing overall team performance and player career choices.
Decrease of Player Salaries Relative to the US Dollar
Over the years, the median salaries of South African rugby players have experienced fluctuations, particularly when measured against the US dollar. From 2011 to 2023, the weakening South African Rand has caused a real decrease in the value of player salaries. This currency depreciation has made foreign contracts more attractive, contributing to the exodus of players seeking better financial opportunities abroad. The declining purchasing power of their earnings in South Africa highlights the economic challenges faced by players who choose to remain in domestic leagues.
Linear Regression Analysis and Player Exodus
A linear regression analysis conducted on data from 2011 to 2023 reveals a significant negative correlation between the median salary of South African rugby players (in USD) and the number of players moving abroad. The analysis, which shows an R-squared value of 0.771, indicates that approximately 77.1% of the variation in player exodus can be explained by changes in median salaries. For every additional dollar in the median salary, the number of players abroad decreases by approximately 0.0022. This statistically significant relationship underscores the strong influence of financial incentives on player decisions to seek opportunities outside South Africa.
Graph 1: Relationship Between Median Salary and Number of South African Players Abroad (2011-2023)

Predictive Analysis Results
Based on the linear regression model, the analysis suggests that:
Threshold Salary: Approximately $195,000 USD.
Predicted Number of Players Abroad at Threshold Salary: Approximately 248 players (reduced from 440).
Interpretation
Salary Level: The model indicates that if the median salary for South African rugby players were around $195,000 USD, the number of players moving abroad would be expected to decrease to approximately 248 players.
Impact: Increasing the median salary to this threshold might make staying in South Africa more financially competitive with playing abroad, potentially reducing the exodus of top talent.
Comparative Salaries and the Decreasing Value of Rugby Salaries in South Africa Versus Other Nations
Graph 2: Comparative Median Salaries (1995-2023)

Graph 3: South African Exodus Versus Salary (1995-2023)

Foreign to Local Player Ratio in Rugby World Cups
Graph 4: Foreign to Local Player Ratio (2011, 2015, 2019, 2023 Rugby World Cups)

The dynamics of South African rugby player exodus are heavily influenced by financial factors, particularly the relative value of domestic salaries compared to international offers. Policies allowing players to play abroad, combined with economic challenges such as currency depreciation, contribute to the movement of players to foreign leagues. Addressing these financial disparities by increasing domestic salaries to competitive levels could help mitigate the exodus and retain more players within the country's rugby ecosystem. However, it's important to note that financial factors are not the only element influencing the success of the Springboks. While financial incentives play a significant role, other aspects such as coaching quality, team cohesion, and strategic game planning are also crucial to their World Cup triumphs.
-------------------------------------------------------
In a follow-up analysis, we will explore a multiple linear regression model to identify additional factors influencing South Africa's success in the Rugby World Cup. This analysis will consider key elements such as player experience, coaching quality, team performance, financial support, and injury rates. By examining these factors, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the variables that contribute to South Africa's performance on the global stage.
References:
Wikipedia - 2011 Rugby World Cup SquadsURL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Rugby_World_Cup_squads
Wikipedia - 2015 Rugby World Cup SquadsURL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Rugby_World_Cup_squads
Wikipedia - 2023 Rugby World Cup SquadsURL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Rugby_World_Cup_squads
The South African - Springboks: Where and who they play for abroad!Mariette Adams, 14 March 2023URL: https://www.thesouthafrican.com/sport/rugby/springboks-where-and-who-they-play-for-abroad/
SARU - South African Rugby Union Player Salaries Data(Data aggregated from multiple sources over the years, including SARU reports and player interviews)
Statista - Historical Exchange RatesURL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263612/historical-exchange-rates-of-major-currencies-against-us-dollar/
RugbyPass - Analysis of Player Salaries and Trends(Various articles and analysis reports on rugby player salaries and trends)
World Rugby - Annual Reports and Financial StatementsURL: https://www.world.rugby/organisation/about-us/reports
Regulatory Policies of Rugby Unions
New Zealand Rugby Union (NZRU)
Rugby Australia (RA)
Rugby Football Union (RFU, England)
Fédération Française de Rugby (FFR)
Welsh Rugby Union (WRU)
Scottish Rugby Union (SRU)
Irish Rugby Football Union (IRFU)
BBC Sport - Rugby Union Player Transfers and SalariesURL: https://www.bbc.com/sport/rugby-union
Financial Times - Impact of Currency Fluctuations on Sports SalariesURL: https://www.ft.com/sport
Rugby World - Player Movements and Salary InsightsURL: https://www.rugbyworld.com/
Additional Notes
Some salary data points and exchange rate conversions were derived from the historical context and public financial reports of rugby unions.
The linear regression analysis and predictive models were based on the compiled data from the sources listed above.
Appendices:
Appendix A: Median Salaries and Number of Players Abroad (2011-2023)
Year | Median Salary (USD) | Players Abroad |
2011 | 206897 | 232 |
2012 | 198000 | 245 |
2013 | 190000 | 260 |
2014 | 180000 | 275 |
2015 | 144000 | 300 |
2016 | 140000 | 320 |
2017 | 135000 | 340 |
2018 | 130000 | 360 |
2019 | 137931 | 400 |
2020 | 132000 | 410 |
2021 | 125000 | 420 |
2022 | 120000 | 430 |
2023 | 138889 | 440 |
Appendix B: Evolution of South Africa's Policy on Foreign-Based Players
Year | Coach | Policy Description |
Pre-2004 | Various | Restrictions on selecting foreign-based players, emphasising domestic rugby strength (Currie Cup, Super Rugby). |
2004 | Jake White | Limited selection of foreign-based players to accommodate top talent abroad while maintaining domestic focus. |
2008 | Peter de Villiers | Further relaxation of the policy, considering more foreign-based players for national team selection. |
2011 | Heyneke Meyer | Flexible approach, allowing several foreign-based players for the 2011 Rugby World Cup squad. |
2016 | Allister Coetzee | Formal opening of the policy, allowing unrestricted selection of foreign-based players. |
2018-Present | Rassie Erasmus / Jacques Nienaber | Continuation of the open policy, focusing on selecting the best talent regardless of club location. |
Appendix C: Top Rugby-Playing Nations' Overseas Player Policies
Country | Policy | Description |
South Africa | Open | Players can freely play abroad and still be eligible for national team selection. |
New Zealand | Closed | Players must play domestically to be eligible for the All Blacks. |
Australia | Limited | The "Giteau Law" allows players with a certain number of caps or years of service to be selected even if they play abroad. |
UK (England) | Closed | Players must play in the Premiership to be eligible for the England team. |
France | Open | Players can play abroad and still be selected for the national team. |
Wales | Limited | The "60 Cap Rule" allows players with 60 or more caps to be selected even if they play abroad. |
Scotland | Open | Players can play abroad and still be selected for the national team. |
Ireland | Closed | Players must play domestically to be eligible for the national team. |
Appendix D: Historical Comparison of the Countries with Open Policies
Countries: South Africa, France, Scotland
South Africa
Year | Policy Change and Impact |
Pre-2004 | Restrictions on selecting foreign-based players, emphasizing domestic rugby strength (Currie Cup, Super Rugby). |
2004 | Introduction of limited selection of foreign-based players under Jake White. |
2008 | Further relaxation of the policy by Peter de Villiers. |
2011 | Flexible approach under Heyneke Meyer, allowing several foreign-based players for the 2011 Rugby World Cup squad. |
2016 | Formal opening of the policy under Allister Coetzee, allowing unrestricted selection of foreign-based players. |
2018-Present | Continuation of the open policy under Rassie Erasmus and Jacques Nienaber. |
France
Year | Policy Change and Impact |
Pre-2000s | Preference for domestic players, with limited selection of foreign-based players. |
2000-2004 | Gradual opening of the policy, reflecting the increasing globalization of rugby. |
2004-2008 | Continued relaxation of restrictions, allowing more foreign-based players. |
2008-2010 | Fully open policy, with no restrictions on selecting foreign-based players. |
2010-2011 | Full implementation of the open policy, maximizing the use of players in top European leagues. |
2011-Present | Ongoing open policy, leveraging both domestic and international talent for national team selection. |
Scotland
Year | Policy Change and Impact |
Pre-2000s | Restrictive policy with a strong preference for domestic players. |
2000-2004 | Gradual relaxation of the policy to include more foreign-based players. |
2004-2008 | Continued opening of the policy, recognizing the need to utilize top talent from abroad. |
2008-2010 | Fully open policy, aligning with the global nature of rugby talent movement. |
2010-2011 | Full adoption of the open policy, focusing on the best available talent regardless of club location. |
2011-Present | Continuation of the open policy, regularly selecting players from top European clubs. |
Key Points
South Africa: Initially restrictive, the policy gradually opened up, culminating in a fully open approach by 2016. This change allowed the selection of top talent from global leagues, enhancing the national team's competitiveness.
France: Transitioned from a preference for domestic players to a fully open policy by 2010, reflecting the globalization of rugby and the influx of international talent into the French domestic league.
Scotland: Moved from a restrictive policy to a fully open one by 2010, allowing the national team to benefit from players competing in top European leagues.
Comparative Analysis
The historical comparison of these countries with open policies reveals a common trend towards leveraging global talent to strengthen national teams. South Africa, France, and Scotland have all recognised the benefits of selecting foreign-based players, which include access to higher levels of competition, diverse playing styles, and the ability to retain top talent that might otherwise be lost to other national teams. This approach has allowed these countries to remain competitive on the international stage despite the challenges posed by player movements and financial incentives from foreign leagues.