top of page

$195 000 median player salary- will reduce player exodus in South Africa.


Currently, there is a growing consensus that South Africa won the Rugby World Cup in 2019 and 2023 due to a change in policy allowing players to be available for selection even if they played abroad. According to this theory, this was a key move by Rassie Erasmus, often cited as a masterstroke and the most significant factor in South Africa's recent World Cup successes. However, as the data shows, players were already playing abroad in 2011 and 2015 without achieving World Cup success, while the 2007 victory was achieved with all players based in South Africa. This suggests that player exodus is not the sole factor behind Springbok success.


South Africa Player Exodus or other factors


It is doubtful that the exodus of players was a strategic move by South Africa rugby to get players up to standard (although it did help players understand all the top leagues) due to inferior South African coaching. Instead, it was the financial attraction that lured them abroad. The key factor was not the promise of massive salaries (with some outliers) but rather the reduction in rugby salaries in South Africa, primarily due to the devaluation of the rand and a struggling economy. The graphs below illustrate how South African median salaries decreased compared to other major rugby-playing countries, with a tipping point occurring after 2010, potentially aligning with key economic data from South Africa.


Foreign Player Ratio


The ratio of foreign-based players in national rugby teams varies significantly by country. South Africa operates an open policy allowing players to freely play abroad and still be eligible for the national team. In contrast, countries like New Zealand and Ireland enforce a closed policy, requiring players to remain in domestic leagues to qualify for national selection. Other nations adopt a limited approach, such as Australia's "Giteau Law" and Wales' "60 Cap Rule," which permit the selection of experienced players playing abroad. This flexibility in policy impacts the availability and quality of players for national squads, influencing overall team performance and player career choices.


Decrease of Player Salaries Relative to the US Dollar


Over the years, the median salaries of South African rugby players have experienced fluctuations, particularly when measured against the US dollar. From 2011 to 2023, the weakening South African Rand has caused a real decrease in the value of player salaries. This currency depreciation has made foreign contracts more attractive, contributing to the exodus of players seeking better financial opportunities abroad. The declining purchasing power of their earnings in South Africa highlights the economic challenges faced by players who choose to remain in domestic leagues.


Linear Regression Analysis and Player Exodus


A linear regression analysis conducted on data from 2011 to 2023 reveals a significant negative correlation between the median salary of South African rugby players (in USD) and the number of players moving abroad. The analysis, which shows an R-squared value of 0.771, indicates that approximately 77.1% of the variation in player exodus can be explained by changes in median salaries. For every additional dollar in the median salary, the number of players abroad decreases by approximately 0.0022. This statistically significant relationship underscores the strong influence of financial incentives on player decisions to seek opportunities outside South Africa.


Graph 1: Relationship Between Median Salary and Number of South African Players Abroad (2011-2023)


Relationship Between Median Salary and Number of South African Players Abroad (2011-2023)


Predictive Analysis Results

Based on the linear regression model, the analysis suggests that:

  • Threshold Salary: Approximately $195,000 USD.

  • Predicted Number of Players Abroad at Threshold Salary: Approximately 248 players (reduced from 440).

Interpretation

  • Salary Level: The model indicates that if the median salary for South African rugby players were around $195,000 USD, the number of players moving abroad would be expected to decrease to approximately 248 players.

  • Impact: Increasing the median salary to this threshold might make staying in South Africa more financially competitive with playing abroad, potentially reducing the exodus of top talent.


Comparative Salaries and the Decreasing Value of Rugby Salaries in South Africa Versus Other Nations

Graph 2: Comparative Median Salaries (1995-2023)


Comparative Median Salaries (1995-2023)


Graph 3: South African Exodus Versus Salary (1995-2023)


South African Exodus Versus Salary (1995-2023)


Foreign to Local Player Ratio in Rugby World Cups

Graph 4: Foreign to Local Player Ratio (2011, 2015, 2019, 2023 Rugby World Cups)



Foreign to Local Player Ratio (2011, 2015, 2019, 2023 Rugby World Cups)



The dynamics of South African rugby player exodus are heavily influenced by financial factors, particularly the relative value of domestic salaries compared to international offers. Policies allowing players to play abroad, combined with economic challenges such as currency depreciation, contribute to the movement of players to foreign leagues. Addressing these financial disparities by increasing domestic salaries to competitive levels could help mitigate the exodus and retain more players within the country's rugby ecosystem. However, it's important to note that financial factors are not the only element influencing the success of the Springboks. While financial incentives play a significant role, other aspects such as coaching quality, team cohesion, and strategic game planning are also crucial to their World Cup triumphs.


-------------------------------------------------------


In a follow-up analysis, we will explore a multiple linear regression model to identify additional factors influencing South Africa's success in the Rugby World Cup. This analysis will consider key elements such as player experience, coaching quality, team performance, financial support, and injury rates. By examining these factors, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the variables that contribute to South Africa's performance on the global stage.



References:


  1. Wikipedia - 2011 Rugby World Cup SquadsURL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Rugby_World_Cup_squads

  2. Wikipedia - 2015 Rugby World Cup SquadsURL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_Rugby_World_Cup_squads

  3. Wikipedia - 2023 Rugby World Cup SquadsURL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Rugby_World_Cup_squads

  4. The South African - Springboks: Where and who they play for abroad!Mariette Adams, 14 March 2023URL: https://www.thesouthafrican.com/sport/rugby/springboks-where-and-who-they-play-for-abroad/

  5. SARU - South African Rugby Union Player Salaries Data(Data aggregated from multiple sources over the years, including SARU reports and player interviews)

  6. Statista - Historical Exchange RatesURL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263612/historical-exchange-rates-of-major-currencies-against-us-dollar/

  7. RugbyPass - Analysis of Player Salaries and Trends(Various articles and analysis reports on rugby player salaries and trends)

  8. World Rugby - Annual Reports and Financial StatementsURL: https://www.world.rugby/organisation/about-us/reports

  9. Regulatory Policies of Rugby Unions

  • New Zealand Rugby Union (NZRU)

  • Rugby Australia (RA)

  • Rugby Football Union (RFU, England)

  • Fédération Française de Rugby (FFR)

  • Welsh Rugby Union (WRU)

  • Scottish Rugby Union (SRU)

  • Irish Rugby Football Union (IRFU)

  1. BBC Sport - Rugby Union Player Transfers and SalariesURL: https://www.bbc.com/sport/rugby-union

  2. Financial Times - Impact of Currency Fluctuations on Sports SalariesURL: https://www.ft.com/sport

  3. Rugby World - Player Movements and Salary InsightsURL: https://www.rugbyworld.com/


Additional Notes

  • Some salary data points and exchange rate conversions were derived from the historical context and public financial reports of rugby unions.

  • The linear regression analysis and predictive models were based on the compiled data from the sources listed above.



Appendices:


Appendix A: Median Salaries and Number of Players Abroad (2011-2023)


Year

Median Salary (USD)

Players Abroad

2011

206897

232

2012

198000

245

2013

190000

260

2014

180000

275

2015

144000

300

2016

140000

320

2017

135000

340

2018

130000

360

2019

137931

400

2020

132000

410

2021

125000

420

2022

120000

430

2023

138889

440


Appendix B: Evolution of South Africa's Policy on Foreign-Based Players

Year

Coach

Policy Description

Pre-2004

Various

Restrictions on selecting foreign-based players, emphasising domestic rugby strength (Currie Cup, Super Rugby).

2004

Jake White

Limited selection of foreign-based players to accommodate top talent abroad while maintaining domestic focus.

2008

Peter de Villiers

Further relaxation of the policy, considering more foreign-based players for national team selection.

2011

Heyneke Meyer

Flexible approach, allowing several foreign-based players for the 2011 Rugby World Cup squad.

2016

Allister Coetzee

Formal opening of the policy, allowing unrestricted selection of foreign-based players.

2018-Present

Rassie Erasmus / Jacques Nienaber

Continuation of the open policy, focusing on selecting the best talent regardless of club location.

Appendix C: Top Rugby-Playing Nations' Overseas Player Policies

Country

Policy

Description

South Africa

Open

Players can freely play abroad and still be eligible for national team selection.

New Zealand

Closed

Players must play domestically to be eligible for the All Blacks.

Australia

Limited

The "Giteau Law" allows players with a certain number of caps or years of service to be selected even if they play abroad.

UK (England)

Closed

Players must play in the Premiership to be eligible for the England team.

France

Open

Players can play abroad and still be selected for the national team.

Wales

Limited

The "60 Cap Rule" allows players with 60 or more caps to be selected even if they play abroad.

Scotland

Open

Players can play abroad and still be selected for the national team.

Ireland

Closed

Players must play domestically to be eligible for the national team.

Appendix D: Historical Comparison of the Countries with Open Policies

Countries: South Africa, France, Scotland

South Africa

Year

Policy Change and Impact

Pre-2004

Restrictions on selecting foreign-based players, emphasizing domestic rugby strength (Currie Cup, Super Rugby).

2004

Introduction of limited selection of foreign-based players under Jake White.

2008

Further relaxation of the policy by Peter de Villiers.

2011

Flexible approach under Heyneke Meyer, allowing several foreign-based players for the 2011 Rugby World Cup squad.

2016

Formal opening of the policy under Allister Coetzee, allowing unrestricted selection of foreign-based players.

2018-Present

Continuation of the open policy under Rassie Erasmus and Jacques Nienaber.

France

Year

Policy Change and Impact

Pre-2000s

Preference for domestic players, with limited selection of foreign-based players.

2000-2004

Gradual opening of the policy, reflecting the increasing globalization of rugby.

2004-2008

Continued relaxation of restrictions, allowing more foreign-based players.

2008-2010

Fully open policy, with no restrictions on selecting foreign-based players.

2010-2011

Full implementation of the open policy, maximizing the use of players in top European leagues.

2011-Present

Ongoing open policy, leveraging both domestic and international talent for national team selection.

Scotland

Year

Policy Change and Impact

Pre-2000s

Restrictive policy with a strong preference for domestic players.

2000-2004

Gradual relaxation of the policy to include more foreign-based players.

2004-2008

Continued opening of the policy, recognizing the need to utilize top talent from abroad.

2008-2010

Fully open policy, aligning with the global nature of rugby talent movement.

2010-2011

Full adoption of the open policy, focusing on the best available talent regardless of club location.

2011-Present

Continuation of the open policy, regularly selecting players from top European clubs.

Key Points

  • South Africa: Initially restrictive, the policy gradually opened up, culminating in a fully open approach by 2016. This change allowed the selection of top talent from global leagues, enhancing the national team's competitiveness.

  • France: Transitioned from a preference for domestic players to a fully open policy by 2010, reflecting the globalization of rugby and the influx of international talent into the French domestic league.

  • Scotland: Moved from a restrictive policy to a fully open one by 2010, allowing the national team to benefit from players competing in top European leagues.


Comparative Analysis

The historical comparison of these countries with open policies reveals a common trend towards leveraging global talent to strengthen national teams. South Africa, France, and Scotland have all recognised the benefits of selecting foreign-based players, which include access to higher levels of competition, diverse playing styles, and the ability to retain top talent that might otherwise be lost to other national teams. This approach has allowed these countries to remain competitive on the international stage despite the challenges posed by player movements and financial incentives from foreign leagues.



  • linkedin
bottom of page